Posted on January 2, 2010 - by La Papillion

Bored old man on a new year’s eve

Photo by Duchamp

New year’s eve, I’m back home at 9 pm already. Let all the hot gals and hunks cheong their heads off while I’m back home, nice and comfy typing an article. Haha, getting old I suppose, but I never really like the crowds and the cacophony that follows in such a countdown event. If you spot me in such events, most likely you’ve got the wrong person.

As I was walking home, I was thinking about the problems related to using dividend yielding stocks as a passive stream of income.

These are the things I think are worth thinking about:

1. Longevity of the passive income stream.

I think this is the most important thing when buying divy stocks like the one I had, CIT. It can give you 10% or 15% per annum, but how long can it last? Don’t give me the bull about defensive stocks either because in a bear market, nothing is defensive and in an accounting fraud, nothing is immune. I’m just thinking that if I have to bank my passive income on a bunch of diversified stocks yielding good dividends, I’m not going to sleep soundly at night. I mean really really soundly.

2. Massively, unforeseeable losses

As you can see, I’m a kiasu and kiasee person. The point of having a passive income is that one day I can stop work when I want to. Hence, the security of my capital and the passive income stream is very important to me. Hey, I have to rely on this to offset my expenses, of course I’m worried! I’m just thinking that what if in one bad investment, years of dividend accrued over the years are destroyed in one shot? I mean I can collect 60+ per lot of CIT for years then suddenly CIT is gone … I might be just lucky enough to recoup my capital and breakeven, but so long for my passive income. Ya, I know diversification can reduce the risk…still.. Read more…

Related posts:

1. The Year Ahead in 2010
2. Investing Pitfalls In the Year of Metal Tiger
3. Trading Report Card – Dec 09 and Year 2009