I feel like very old man keep reminding myself about pitfalls in investment with data. Because many experts out there are giving questionable data and I need to make my own judgement including when I read my own blog in context. And I encourage people always do the same. Don’t take word at face value.Part 1 here’s the link
2nd Part is the continuation of STI performance being marketed. As said earlier, the common figure of 7% annualized (including div) is at this time frame.
If we are to use a time machine and zoom back to Oct’2007, someone will by harping STI giving more than 10% annualized returns ! Why ? Let me show you use STI returns on this period since 1987.
Yes is 11.5% annualized returns. So why suddenly in 2017 period people market long term is now 7% ? Because this long term …